The Human Design community needs less arrogance

entitlement from who thinks got Human Design right

---

The Last Supper (1995). Great movie on the topic of this entry ;)

The need to experiment and learn about your Human Design is a complete personal experience. Of course we need guidance in order to learn the system, but this guidance cannot be completely free of the guide’s judgment. 

Human Design is a system of its own, despite being a mix of systems. Kind of like the human body, which can be dissected but the sum of its parts is what makes it what it is. 

Ra’s teachings

The arrogance I talk about in the title of this entry is concerning not following the exact guidance of Ra’s teachings or the people of Jovian Archive.

For example, there is a lot of hateful and discriminatory words towards the people that want to engage in Human Design using other systems of astrology besides Tropical, (like Sidereal or True Sidereal astrology systems) in my opinion this will create a weak spot in Human Design if people cannot have a respectful conversation on this topic. This also creates entitlement from either point of view, because it encourages doing Human Design and thinking you got it right and others got it wrong.

Esoterics evolve, systems grow, people experiment and this is what makes those same systems stay in the current, it doesn’t matter if the findings aren’t substantial, they will always be useful. 

Online bullying masquerade as informational content

Some people I’ve seen online (specially instagram) make so much negative criticism that makes me not take their approach to Human Design seriously.

When you’re completely blind to new discoveries and you think they are false, a mean comment to insert your level of superiority of truly “knowing” the system, its completely contradictory with the main point of Human Design which you’re defending so much. 

The Science of DIFFERENTIATION

I wish there was more spaces to talk about the different routes or bends that Human Design could take, because that would only make it more experimental and diversified. 

THE CONTRADICTIONS ON RA’S SOURCES

I’d understand that Jovian Archive would not agree with this, because as an institution they are completely bound to Ra’s work and words, any bending would compromise the content they’re selling. But from readers and online communities this seems completely alienating and arrogant to separate what’s right or wrong.

To share from a point of believe is not what makes me upset, but the bullying from taking a different opinion that goes “against” Ra. There is so much information within Ra’s work that is already contradictory, like Zen Human Design, or the differences from The Definitive Book of Human Design and The Book of Letters. And to take Jovian’s work and Ra’s followers word as the only verdict for what Human Design is, seems catastrophic and completely against what our authority needs. 

Experience is what leads us to the path of knowing ourselves, and looking at the systems Human Design is made of only shows how much they advanced because they had the chance to evolve and change and expand, these systems weren’t bound to a creator, they were bound to Human Evolution which is the point of awareness. 

Using knowledge as arrogance makes Human Design seem like dogma.

Where is your judgment when choosing which Human Design system to use?

What’s the tone of your comment when you share about a modality of Human Design you don’t agree with?

xoxo, dens

---

MORE ENTRIES ON HUMAN DESIGN